2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD investigation and assessment of wall heat flux partitioning model for the prediction of high pressure subcooled flow boiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the sensitivity tests on turbulence closure models, the k − ω SST presented the best overall results by improving especially the local liquid phase axial temperature prediction in comparison with the other studied cases and thus being chosen for all further simulations. Murallidharan et al [15] listed studies where either k − ε or k − ω models led to better results in subcooled boiling simulations and stated that for high pressure flows this question is still unsolved. Although the obtained data favored the k − ω models, it also indicated that the near-wall treatment for the turbulence modeling has a great influence on k − ε and RSM applications for the proposed scenario since only these models were used with independent treatment models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the sensitivity tests on turbulence closure models, the k − ω SST presented the best overall results by improving especially the local liquid phase axial temperature prediction in comparison with the other studied cases and thus being chosen for all further simulations. Murallidharan et al [15] listed studies where either k − ε or k − ω models led to better results in subcooled boiling simulations and stated that for high pressure flows this question is still unsolved. Although the obtained data favored the k − ω models, it also indicated that the near-wall treatment for the turbulence modeling has a great influence on k − ε and RSM applications for the proposed scenario since only these models were used with independent treatment models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murallidharan et al [15] and Gu et al [16] verified a variety of sub-models related to wall boiling model, like nucleation site density, bubble departure diameter and bubble departure frequency, while comparing results with experimental data from Bartolomei and Chanturiya [14] and Bartolomei et al [17], considering system pressures within the range of 3.0-45.0 MPa. Prabhudharwadkar et al [18] also analyzed the wall boiling sub-models, but for subcooled boiling in refrigerants R12 and R113.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Over the years, the Eulerian-Eulerian two-fluid model coupled with the heat flux partitioning model (EEHFP) has been used to study the characteristics of boiling flows [7][8][9][10]. Generally, in the heat flux partitioning (HFP) model, the heat flux is partitioned into three components, heat flux for vapor generation, quenching (In a bubble ebullition cycle, cold liquid replaces the bubble as the bubble lifts-off of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, various simulations have been conducted in various papers [1][2][3][4][5]. Numerical analysis of subcooled two-phase flow at high pressure has confirmed that the Eulerian multiphase model including a Reynolds stress turbulence model is suitable for predicting the actual phenomenon [6][7][8][9][10]. Single-phase convective heat transfer and vapor-water two-phase boiling heat transfer experiments have been conducted in a vertical seven-rod bundle at a low flow rate near atmospheric pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%