2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD-DEM based full-scale ship-ice interaction research under FSICR ice condition in restricted brash ice channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…h denotes the ice thickness, D represents the equivalent diameter of pack ice, determined through conversion and set to 0.079 m. When DEM and CFD are coupled for solution, a smaller time step is required in the DEM component to obtain more accurate results. Following the time step settings in Huang et al [24] and Zhang et al [27], the time step for the coupled CFD-DEM solution is set to 0.005 s in this study.…”
Section: Ice Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…h denotes the ice thickness, D represents the equivalent diameter of pack ice, determined through conversion and set to 0.079 m. When DEM and CFD are coupled for solution, a smaller time step is required in the DEM component to obtain more accurate results. Following the time step settings in Huang et al [24] and Zhang et al [27], the time step for the coupled CFD-DEM solution is set to 0.005 s in this study.…”
Section: Ice Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By summarizing and analysing the results, a general empirical formula was derived for rapid ice resistance prediction. Additionally, Luo et al [26] and Zhang et al [27] investigated ice resistance in restricted pack ice channel using model-scale and full-scale ships, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models can be categorized based on their scenario features into e.g. models on global ice loas in level ice (Tan et al, 2014;Xuan et al, 2021;Li et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020b;Ni et al, 2020) as well as escort in level ice (Liu and Ji, 2021), ice resistance in pack and thin ice (Zong and Zhou, 2019), ship resistance in open-water ice channel (Huang et al, 2021), narrow ice channel (Sazonov and Dobrodeev, 2021;Li et al, 2021) as well as in restricted brash ice channel (Zhang et al, 2022;Luo et al, 2020;Xie et al, 2022), ship resistance in unconsolidated ridges (Gong et al, 2019), resistance in ice floes (Huang et al, 2020(Huang et al, , 2021b, broken ice pieces . In addition, Kim et al (2020) and Sun et al (2022) applied machine learning method to estimate ice resistance based on model test data, while Milaković et al (2020) established machine learning model based on simulation data.…”
Section: Extensive Review Outcomes Outside the Project To Supplement ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the conventional CFD method discretizes the continuous medium by Euler mesh, which is not available to consider the discontinuous medium such as brash ice. Different from CFD method, DEM method is a kind of the Lagrangian method [2] [3] , which is quite suitable to model ice flow behavior. In DEM method, the ice motion can be easily simulated by the calculation of the contact forces and moments imposed by the other fluid and ice in the interaction region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%