41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference &Amp;amp; Exhibit 2005
DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-4438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD Computation for Rocket Engine Start-Up Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total number of grid points is 3,653,299, or 4,421,166 cells for all four cases. The total cell numbers used in this study is higher than the 2,058,192 cells used in the nozzlette configuration [W1], and much higher than the 1,275,120 cells used in the SSME benchmark [9], and the 145,500, 145,500, and 405,900 points used on LE-7, LE-7A, and CTP50-R5-L [10], and the 85,000 cells used on Vulcain 2 [11], respectively. It is noted that although the cross-sectional flow areas of the four thrusters do not have to be the same, they are kept the same such that the results are compared based on the same flow area.…”
Section: Computational Grid Generationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The total number of grid points is 3,653,299, or 4,421,166 cells for all four cases. The total cell numbers used in this study is higher than the 2,058,192 cells used in the nozzlette configuration [W1], and much higher than the 1,275,120 cells used in the SSME benchmark [9], and the 145,500, 145,500, and 405,900 points used on LE-7, LE-7A, and CTP50-R5-L [10], and the 85,000 cells used on Vulcain 2 [11], respectively. It is noted that although the cross-sectional flow areas of the four thrusters do not have to be the same, they are kept the same such that the results are compared based on the same flow area.…”
Section: Computational Grid Generationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a result, grids 3d2 and 3d3 were selected for the transient computations. The total grid points used in these 3-D grids are higher than the 1,286,934 points used for the SSME benchmark [9] and much higher than the 85,000 cells used on Vulcain 2 [11] and the 145,500-405,900 points used for the side-load calculations for the LE-7, LE-7A, and CTP-50-R5-L engines [10].…”
Section: Computational Grid Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advances of computer technology and computational methods, three-dimensional (3-D) timeaccurate CFD methodologies have emerged as a useful tool that can simulate asymmetric shock evolutions and predict the associated peak side loads. For example, Yonezawa et al [10] simulated the startup transient for the LE-7A engine, Boccaletto and Lequette [11] simulated the startup transient for the Vulcain 2 engine, and Wang [9] benchmarked the startup transient for the SSME. Other relevant computational efforts can be found in [3,12,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of experimental 1,3,4,10 and numerical [11][12][13] works have focused on shock-boundary layer interactions in rocket nozzles. Importantly, all existing evidence suggest that under the overexpanded flow conditions producing shocks, crossstream shock structures -typically normal shocks or Mach discs -only exist as single entities, never, for example, in pairs or triples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%