2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/753/8/082019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD code comparison for 2D airfoil flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EllipSys3D was found to be 2-6 times faster while producing almost identical numerical results (Cavar et al, 2016). More recent sources also show that these two solvers yield comparable results (Sørensen et al, 2016;Yilmaz et al, 2017;Boorsma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Ellipsys3dmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…EllipSys3D was found to be 2-6 times faster while producing almost identical numerical results (Cavar et al, 2016). More recent sources also show that these two solvers yield comparable results (Sørensen et al, 2016;Yilmaz et al, 2017;Boorsma et al, 2018).…”
Section: Ellipsys3dmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Figure 2 illustrates the computational setup with the current setting consisting of a DU airfoil. An O-mesh type was designed for the computations with a computational domain radius of 32 times the airfoil chord length R = 32c, which is in the order of the computational size recommended by Sørensen et al [27] for this type of simulations. The aim of the current study is to find the optimal MT position to increase DU91W(2)250 airfoil aerodynamic performance and to investigate its influence on the average power output of a 5 MW Wind turbine.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 we note the unexpected, slight increase in error for EllipSys3D in the thrust value on the finest mesh level. It also surprising that the compressible solver seems to benefit so drastically from increase in cell count but recent studies (Sørensen et al, 2016) have suggested that it can be the case for some compressible solvers albeit perhaps not as much as shown here. Looking at the Prandtl-Glauert (Glauert, 1928) lift and drag correction:…”
Section: Mesh Convergence Study 10mentioning
confidence: 60%