2013
DOI: 10.3139/217.2753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD Analysis of the Frame Invariance of the Melt Temperature Rise in a Single-screw Extruder

Abstract: In analytical analyses for single-screw extruders the simplified approach of rotating the barrel and keeping the screw fixed is often used instead of rotating the screw and fixing the barrel. Although the flow field is independent of the reference frame, as has already been shown to a satisfactory degree (Rauwendaal et al., 1997), the question of the dependence of the melt temperature rise on the reference frame is still being challenged, e.g. Campbell et al. (2001, 2008). In this work we develop a finite-volu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prescribing this rotational movement at the topknown as barrel rotation or inverse kinematics -might appear intuitively questionable as the resulting flow field does not seem to resemble physical conditions. However, we follow the argumentation of Habla et al [36] who prove frame invariance of the melt temperature and in general discuss the negligibility of centrifugal and Coriolis forces. At the inflow, we thus prescribe a linear velocity profile u = (0, v, 0), with v = 0.027646 z 0.0075 m s −1 .…”
Section: Test Case Generationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Prescribing this rotational movement at the topknown as barrel rotation or inverse kinematics -might appear intuitively questionable as the resulting flow field does not seem to resemble physical conditions. However, we follow the argumentation of Habla et al [36] who prove frame invariance of the melt temperature and in general discuss the negligibility of centrifugal and Coriolis forces. At the inflow, we thus prescribe a linear velocity profile u = (0, v, 0), with v = 0.027646 z 0.0075 m s −1 .…”
Section: Test Case Generationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This has been shown using complete finite element analysis. [26][27][28][29] Further research, demonstrated both experimentally and with screw and barrel rotation-based models, showed that barrel rotation models over-predict the temperature rise in screw channels while screw rotation models give the proper trends for dissipation and polymer flow channel temperature rise. [30] The reasons for the limitation of the conventional barrel analysis when compared to the general predictions of the screwrotation analysis were recently discussed in detail.…”
Section: Screw Rotation Melting Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 32 ] This screw rotation model predicted that the solid bed melted due to dissipation and heat transfer in all four melt films surrounding the melting solid bed, as illustrated in Figure 9. [ 17 ] Previous analysis of barrel rotation dissipation in extrusion [ 28 ] over‐predicted the polymer melt temperature when barrel rotation dissipation was used in the to analyze the pumping section of the screw. The screw rotation velocities were used in this analysis because the process is dissipation dominated, and dissipation is not frame indifferent (http://extrusionwiki.com).…”
Section: Modeling Melting Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation of the accuracy given by this kinematics assumption is addressed in different works [ 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ].…”
Section: Models For the Materials Extrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature field is also the same in the two kinematic conditions, and this has been demonstrated by means of the FVM method [ 84 ].…”
Section: Models For the Materials Extrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%