2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/125405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD Analysis of the Effect of Elbow Radius on Pressure Drop in Multiphase Flow

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was performed in four different 90 degree elbows with air-water two-phase flows. The inside diameters of the elbows were 6.35 mm and 12.7 mm with radius to diameter ratios (r/D) of 1.5 to 3. The pressure drops at two different upstream and downstream locations were investigated using empirical, experimental, and computational methods. The combination of three different air velocities, ranging from 15.24 to 45.72 m/sec, and nine different water velocities, in the rang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 ). The pressure loss due to a bend is dependent on the ratio of the radius of curvature of the bend to the diameter of the pipe [ 29 ]. We surmised that the discrepancies in pressure loss through the tubular part of NTTs between measured and predicted values are mainly due to the sharp bend of the NTTs, and that the pressure losses due to the bend increase in the preformed NTTs with smaller IDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 ). The pressure loss due to a bend is dependent on the ratio of the radius of curvature of the bend to the diameter of the pipe [ 29 ]. We surmised that the discrepancies in pressure loss through the tubular part of NTTs between measured and predicted values are mainly due to the sharp bend of the NTTs, and that the pressure losses due to the bend increase in the preformed NTTs with smaller IDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure-based solver of ANSYS Fluent is used for the simulations. In the mixture model, the drag coefficient needed to compute the relative velocity 51,52 between the phases is calculated using the Schiller and Naumann correlation. 53…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fully developed flow the required Le/D is approximately between (100 -150) [25]. In this study, due to the difficulties and limitations of the experimental test method, the Le/D was set to be 40, as mentioned and validated by [20]. Unstructured mesh with an optimal number of nodes was used.…”
Section: The Cfd Approach and Geometry Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mazumder and Siddique [19] showed that the pressure decreased at the fluid exits from the elbow and a higher pressure drop obtained at increasing air superficial velocity. Velocity and pressure drop profiles of the mixture and their cross-section contour maps by CFD simulation have been provided for distinctive multi-phase flow conducts [20]. Csizmadia and Hos [21] investigated a computational and experimental studies to determine the friction loss coefficient of power law fluids and Bingham for the flow across elbows and diffuser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%