1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70217-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cesarean section delivery in the 1980's: International comparison by indication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
81
1
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
81
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The main indications for cesarean delivery are previous cesarean delivery, breech presentation, and fetal distress [11]. Although CS is a safe operation, when it is performed without medical need it puts mothers and their babies at risk of short-and long-term health problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main indications for cesarean delivery are previous cesarean delivery, breech presentation, and fetal distress [11]. Although CS is a safe operation, when it is performed without medical need it puts mothers and their babies at risk of short-and long-term health problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women also have great dislike for caesarean section especially when there is no living child to show for it and would often try vaginal delivery at home or religious houses after a section thus predisposing themselves to uterine rupture with its resultant morbidity and mortality. It is proposed that careful probing of the trend and indications for the use of caesarean delivery may identify pathway to lower the caesarean section rate [10] which was informed in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-section rates) since these are often more influenced by supply or induced demand rather than by need. This results in the well-documented large variations in operative delivery rates throughout the world (Thiery & Derom 1986;Lomas & Enkin 1989;Barros et al 1991;Macfarlane & Chamberlain 1993;Francome & Savage 1993;Notzon et al 1994;van Roosmalen & Van der Does 1995;Porreco & Thorp 1996). It is possible, however, to consider only those interventions that are performed for absolute maternal indications (AMI) such as severe ante-partum haemorrhage, placenta praevia and abruptio placentae; severe postpartum haemorrhage requiring surgical intervention; foetopelvic disproportion, including prerupture and uterine rupture; shoulder or transverse lie and brow presentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%