1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-7055-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) Osteophytes in the cervical spondylotic spine were believed to be reabsorbed after anterior interbody fusion, 33) but the osteophytes are not reabsorbed after simple discectomy. 36) Subtotal corpectomy, which makes osteophyte removal safe, results in a good outcome for 57.5% to 98% of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.…”
Section: Necessity Of Osteophyte Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Osteophytes in the cervical spondylotic spine were believed to be reabsorbed after anterior interbody fusion, 33) but the osteophytes are not reabsorbed after simple discectomy. 36) Subtotal corpectomy, which makes osteophyte removal safe, results in a good outcome for 57.5% to 98% of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.…”
Section: Necessity Of Osteophyte Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%