Understanding Dental Caries 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30552-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Sclerotic Dentin: Resin Bonding

Abstract: Many reports have indicated that resin bond strengths to noncarious sclerotic cervical dentin are lower than bonds made to normal dentin. This is thought to be due to tubule occlusion by acid-resistant mineral salts, preventing resin tag formation following acid etching. The purpose of this review was to critically examine what is known about the structure of this type of dentin. Recent transmission electron microscopy revealed that in addition to occlusion of the tubules by mineral crystals, many parts of wed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistically signi cant negative correlation between SBS and M indicate that the increase in secondary dentine mineralization may signi cantly reduce the bonding capacity. The percentage difference in SBS between III-C and III-R groups of the present study (46%), was within the range of the differences reported between normal and sclerotic dentine of non-carious cervical lesions bonded with a self-etch adhesive (45%) [23,24,51]. Although the biosynthesis and structure of sclerotic are different from secondary dentine, they both show increased mineralization in older patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statistically signi cant negative correlation between SBS and M indicate that the increase in secondary dentine mineralization may signi cantly reduce the bonding capacity. The percentage difference in SBS between III-C and III-R groups of the present study (46%), was within the range of the differences reported between normal and sclerotic dentine of non-carious cervical lesions bonded with a self-etch adhesive (45%) [23,24,51]. Although the biosynthesis and structure of sclerotic are different from secondary dentine, they both show increased mineralization in older patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The increase of primary dentine mineralization reduces the bond strength with resin composites mediated with etch and rinse or self-etch adhesives [19,22,23]. A typical example is bonding to sclerotic dentine, where the more aggressive etch and rinse adhesives demonstrated higher bond strength compared to self-etch products [24]. Secondary dentine may emerge as a small area surrounded by primary dentine in deep cavity preparations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously reported that the SBS of resin cements depends on several factors, such as the type of dentin (coronal, apical, caries-affected, and sclerotic), preparation depth (superficial or close to the pulp), and tooth surface management [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. For SARCs, no conditioning of dentin with a bonding agent is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bonding capacity of the present time adhesives to the non-carious cervical lesions with sclerosed dentine was accounted to 20-45% lesser than those attached to self-made similarly shaped cavities created in healthy tooth structure. This disparity is due to the thin hybrid layers in the former, and the complex structure of the resin-bonded interface 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the improved esthetics and adhesion, composites are also alternative material for restoration of NCCL. Short comings of composite restorations in cervical areas have been associated with stress generation on the tooth restoration interface due to polymerization shrinkage, and tensile stress caused by oblique occlusal loading causing debonding 6,8 . Flowable composites with low viscosities provided excellent handling characteristics with syringe delivery system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%