2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00093-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical response to vaccination against HPV16 E7 in case of severe dysplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CIN3 patients underwent conization 4 weeks after the last vaccination and CIN1 patients were followed up at close intervals, except for two women with persistent cytological atypia who were treated either by laser or by conization 6 months after vaccination. The vaccine was well tolerated by all the patients with no serious adverse events either reported or detected ( [33] and data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CIN3 patients underwent conization 4 weeks after the last vaccination and CIN1 patients were followed up at close intervals, except for two women with persistent cytological atypia who were treated either by laser or by conization 6 months after vaccination. The vaccine was well tolerated by all the patients with no serious adverse events either reported or detected ( [33] and data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The eligibility criteria for CIN1 patients were the persistence of a low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion as diagnosed by cytological examination and biopsy-proven CIN1 for a minimum of 3 months with detection of oncogenic HPV (detected by Hybrid Capture II System, Digene, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The eligibility criteria for CIN3 patients have been previously described [33]. Briefly, they had highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion as diagnosed by single-layer cytology and biopsy-proven CIN3.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following vaccination, no viral clearance or lesion regression was detected in CIN3 patients. This could be due to the fact that histological assessment took place early and the induction of only low-level immunization (27).…”
Section: Peptide/protein-based Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a first clinical study, five patients with HPV16 positive, histologically demonstrated severe cervical dysplasia (CIN III) received three doses of the vaccine four weeks apart (within two months) before conization (removal of the lesions) was performed. Histological analysis of the biopsies showed CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration and a limited degree of regression [81]. In a second phase I/II clinical trial seven patients, five with CIN III and two with CIN I, received three i.m.…”
Section: Innate and Acquired Immune Responses To Hpvmentioning
confidence: 99%