1982
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90179-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical priming prior to dilatation and evacuation: A comparison of methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its superiority lies in its effectiveness, low costs, and convenience of use with multiple routes of administration. The major disadvantage of misoprostol is its adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain [ 82 , 83 ]. On the other hand, osmotic dilators are well-known cervical ripening agents with high efficiency and a small percentage of adverse effects.…”
Section: Surgical Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its superiority lies in its effectiveness, low costs, and convenience of use with multiple routes of administration. The major disadvantage of misoprostol is its adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain [ 82 , 83 ]. On the other hand, osmotic dilators are well-known cervical ripening agents with high efficiency and a small percentage of adverse effects.…”
Section: Surgical Abortionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like in labour, during the second trimester abortion, the cervix has to be effaced, softened and dilated prior to expulsion of the fetus. Lauersen et al (1) used laminaria tent and several analogues of prostaglandins for cervical priming prior to induced abortion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%