1997
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Pedicle Screws Versus Lateral Mass Screws

Abstract: Cervical pedicle screws demonstrated a significantly higher resistance to pull-out forces than did lateral mass screws. The variability in pedicle morphometry and orientation requires careful preoperative assessment to determine the suitability of pedicle screw insertion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
118
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
118
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cervical pedicle screw fixation has been shown to be the most stable form of cervical instrumentation [9,12,14]. However, due to the close proximity of the spinal cord, nerve roots and vertebral arteries, this type of surgery is generally considered too risky.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical pedicle screw fixation has been shown to be the most stable form of cervical instrumentation [9,12,14]. However, due to the close proximity of the spinal cord, nerve roots and vertebral arteries, this type of surgery is generally considered too risky.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because transpedicular screw fixation has been found to be effective in the stabilization of the middle and lower cervical spine, a number of studies have quantified the dimensions and angulations of the cervical pedicle [6,9,10,14,16,20]. While these studies have contributed critical information to the spinal surgeon's fund of knowledge, there has been a notable absence of research describing the shape of the cervical pedicle along its axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of pedicle screws for the repair of non-traumatic lesions in the middle and lower cervical spine [1][2][3][4][5]. While other techniques such as anterior plating, interspinous wiring, and lateral mass screw fixation are still being used to stabilize the cervical spine, transpedicular screw fixation has been found to confer superior levels of fixation with a reduced likelihood of hardware loosening, particularly in the repair of three-column fractures [1,8,9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,7 Even under direct visualization in a cadaveric study or in experienced surgical hands, pedicle breaches have been reported 8% to 13% of the time. 4,8 Pedicle screw fixation in T1, in contrast, is more straightforward. Anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging is almost always possible, and the T1 pedicle is generally large enough to instrument.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%