2000
DOI: 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion: Assessment of Safety and Accuracy with Computer-Assisted Image Guidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to other authors [8,12]. As mentioned above, we cannot make clear conclusions concerning the effect of using image guidance due to obvious bias.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Relevant Screw Misplacementcontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to other authors [8,12]. As mentioned above, we cannot make clear conclusions concerning the effect of using image guidance due to obvious bias.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Relevant Screw Misplacementcontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous reports on the use of cervical pedicle screws have focused on anatomical specialties of the cervical spine [6,9,14,17,18], biomechanical issues [6,10,15] and surgical techniques [8,11,12]. Few publications dealt with the complications attributed to this surgical technique [1,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as Kamimura et al [13] quite rightly pointed out, the surgeon still needs to know the pedicle morphology to ensure that the computer guides the screws correctly. The overall consensus throughout these articles is that no matter what the technique, the surgeon needs to have a high level of three-dimensional anatomical knowledge, to ensure safe placement of cervical pedicle screws [15,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%