2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical mucus removal before embryo transfer in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, systematic reviews showed little evidence of an overall benefit of cervical mucus removal before ET for women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Similar outcomes were reported in terms of clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live-birth rates between groups with and without cervical mucus cleaning [31]. On the other hand, significantly increased pregnancy rates were reported in 2 retrospective studies [32, 33] with cervical mucus removal by cytobrush and vigorous irrigation of the cervical canal respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Additionally, systematic reviews showed little evidence of an overall benefit of cervical mucus removal before ET for women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Similar outcomes were reported in terms of clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live-birth rates between groups with and without cervical mucus cleaning [31]. On the other hand, significantly increased pregnancy rates were reported in 2 retrospective studies [32, 33] with cervical mucus removal by cytobrush and vigorous irrigation of the cervical canal respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Studies included in the review were low to intermediate quality, and the researchers concluded that mucus removal done before the embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI patients had a very small benefit. The results also suggested that implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were similar [4]. In another study, the authors stated that mucus remnants on the tip of embryo transfer catheter was associated with lower implantation and pregnancy rates [1,10,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The success of embryo transfer which is the final step in IVF/ ICSI treatments depends on additional factors other than endometrial receptivity and the quality of embryos. Ultrasound guidance, myometrial contractions, type of transfer catheter or the mode of loading, dummy transfer, the site that the embryos were placed, presence of cervical mucus and /or blood, a blood-stained catheter after transfer or an embryo stuck in the catheter are some such factors [4][5][6]. Sperms need to go through vagina and cervix and reach upper genital system for fertilization and to achieve this they have to penetrate into the cervical mucus (CM) which is a hydrolyzed gel containing various forms of mucin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the time relation with the ET, these can be divided in three main groups (Craciunas, Tsampras, & Fitzgerald, 2014): (i) pre ET (dummy ET, cervical and endometrial preparation), (ii) at the time of ET (catheter choice, site of embryo placement, ultrasound guidance) and (iii) post ET (fibrin sealant, mechanical closure of the cervix, bed rest).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%