1969
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0200515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Mucus Penetration in Vitro by Fresh and Frozen-Preserved Human Semen Specimens

Abstract: A serious difficulty in the use of frozen-preserved human semen for donor insemination is our inability to predict, without rather extensive clinical trials, which specimens will be successful in producing conception and which will be generally infertile. Predictions cannot be made from the pre-freeze motility of the specimen (Behrman & Sawada, 1966) nor, in our experience, from the fertility of a donor's freshly ejaculated specimen. A technique for determination of cervical mucus penetration by spermatozoa us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the rate of pregnancies resulting from thawed semen has been lower than the rate of pregnancies from fresh semen [4]. Reasons for the differences between the pregnancy rates of fresh and thawed semen include ultrastructural changes [ 131, decreased cervical mucus penetrability [8,21], and reduced postthaw motility [2, 171.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate of pregnancies resulting from thawed semen has been lower than the rate of pregnancies from fresh semen [4]. Reasons for the differences between the pregnancy rates of fresh and thawed semen include ultrastructural changes [ 131, decreased cervical mucus penetrability [8,21], and reduced postthaw motility [2, 171.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a survey of the literature, Richardson (1975) concluded that frozen-thawed human semen is 15-25 % less fertile than fresh semen. Freezing and thawing causes a reduction in percentage motility (Beck & Silverstein, 1975), a reduced ability to penetrate cervical mucus (Fjällbrant & Ackerman, 1969;Ulstein, 1973), and a reduced survival time in the female tract (Behrman, 1971). There also seems to be an impairment of oxidative metabolism (Ackerman, 1968;Guérin & Czyba, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa can affect a number of parameters, such as sperm motility (Englert et al ., 1989; Yoshida et al ., 1990), their penetration into cervical mucus (Fjallbrant & Ackerman, 1969; Weidel & Prins, 1987), the acrosomal structure (Alexander, 1977; Wooley & Richardson, 1978; Mahadevan & Trounson, 1984; Cross & Hanks, 1991), and the activity of acrosin (Mack & Zaneveld, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%