2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical mucus and contraception: what we know and what we don't

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary mechanism of action is to inhibit ovulation. Similar to the progestin-containing IUD, it also thins the endometrial lining and thickens the cervical mucus [30,46]. The etonogestrel implant has an extremely low failure rate, comparable to that for permanent sterilization [28].…”
Section: Most Effective With Fewest Contraindications: Intrauterine mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary mechanism of action is to inhibit ovulation. Similar to the progestin-containing IUD, it also thins the endometrial lining and thickens the cervical mucus [30,46]. The etonogestrel implant has an extremely low failure rate, comparable to that for permanent sterilization [28].…”
Section: Most Effective With Fewest Contraindications: Intrauterine mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, different HC delivery methods may have different mechanisms of action (e.g., systemic versus local), and consequently the required HC target dose levels will depend on the specific administration mode. While some HCs such as oral contraceptives, intravaginal rings or injectables largely function systemically by suppressing ovulation, other topically administered methods such as vaginal films and IUDs may work by creating unfavourable local conditions for sperm penetration, sperm capacitation and fertilisation [34].…”
Section: Action Area 4: Selecting An Effective Target Dose For Hcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to relying on the Pearl Index for measuring contraceptive efficacy, other pharmacodynamic surrogate markers have been tested to evaluate whether ovulation or changes in cervical mucus quality might be reliable future predictors of pregnancy risk [34]. This work targets the development of new, reliable local and systemic surrogate markers that could predict contraceptive efficacy.…”
Section: Progress To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a study examining cervical mucus in 28 women throughout 7-, 9- and 11-day CFIs in four cycles reported that cervical mucus remained unfavourable to sperm penetration, the authors remark on the individual variation in response 23. A recent review found the existing evidence base to be very limited for the contribution of progestogen-affected mucus to contraceptive efficacy 24. Furthermore, any such effect of the progestogen component of COCs must be at its lowest if a fertile ovulation is pending, whether due to a true ‘pill-failure’ after a 7-day CFI or after a lengthened CFI, as it will be at least 168 hours since the progestogen was last ingested.…”
Section: Contraceptive Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%