2019
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1659239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical length should be measured for women with placenta previa: cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A short cervical length at admission (< 2.5 cm) was, however, strongly associated with APH. Previous studies have reported that a short cervix is a risk factor in predicting massive bleeding for PP [17][18][19][20]. Although the cut-off value was different in each study,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A short cervical length at admission (< 2.5 cm) was, however, strongly associated with APH. Previous studies have reported that a short cervix is a risk factor in predicting massive bleeding for PP [17][18][19][20]. Although the cut-off value was different in each study,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…21 Even with the use of different cut-off values at the time of examination and frequency of cervical length measurements, short cervix was verified to strongly predict the occurrence of massive APH. 22 In this study, previous UAE has been identified as a novel eleven-fold increased risk factor for APH. UAE combined with curettage has been proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In recent years, the CL has been proposed as a predictor of intraoperative blood loss in patients with placenta previa. However, the research methods and cut‐off values of CL in previous studies were varied 9,15,16,24 . Altraigey et al 9 and Fukushima et al 15 divided patients into two groups (CL ≤3 cm and CL >3 cm), and found that patients with CL ≤3 cm had a higher risk of massive bleeding (bleeding greater than 2000 ml).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the research methods and cut‐off values of CL in previous studies were varied 9,15,16,24 . Altraigey et al 9 and Fukushima et al 15 divided patients into two groups (CL ≤3 cm and CL >3 cm), and found that patients with CL ≤3 cm had a higher risk of massive bleeding (bleeding greater than 2000 ml). Using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, Polat et al 16 found that a CL of 2.05 cm was a predictor of more than four packages of transfused sedimented erythrocytes in patients with placenta percreta undergoing hysterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%