2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical flexion–relaxation response to neck muscle fatigue in males and females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a document task was carried out for 50 min to compare the FRR values, which decreased from 3.11 before the document writing task to 2.79 after it ( Section 3.3 ); this means that the task of 50 min caused fatigue in the CES. This result was similar to those of previous studies [ 15 , 36 ]. Yoo et al (2011) also reported that FRR could be used to evaluate the potential risk of neck discomfort during computer work [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, a document task was carried out for 50 min to compare the FRR values, which decreased from 3.11 before the document writing task to 2.79 after it ( Section 3.3 ); this means that the task of 50 min caused fatigue in the CES. This result was similar to those of previous studies [ 15 , 36 ]. Yoo et al (2011) also reported that FRR could be used to evaluate the potential risk of neck discomfort during computer work [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Each participant was paid at a rate of $15.00 per hour for participation. To identify the effect of neck health conditions, participants were divided into two groups (low-FRR and normal-FRR) based on the threshold FRR value of 2.5, which was used to identify the presence or absence of FRP [ 15 , 27 ]. The participants with FRR value higher than 2.5 (16 males) were placed in the normal-FRR group, and the remaining (seven males) were classified as the low-FRR group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations