1994
DOI: 10.1177/095646249400500526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Epithelial Abnormalities in Females with and without Genital Warts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of detecting HPV in the cervix was three times higher when patients had genital warts. Other studies show that women with genital warts may be at an increased risk for harboring high-risk HPV types [Moscicki et al, 2001] and have a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia risk up to six times greater [Ward et al, 1994] than women in the general population [Sellors et al, 2000] since external genital warts may be a marker of a relative deficiency in immune response [Shlay et al, 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of detecting HPV in the cervix was three times higher when patients had genital warts. Other studies show that women with genital warts may be at an increased risk for harboring high-risk HPV types [Moscicki et al, 2001] and have a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia risk up to six times greater [Ward et al, 1994] than women in the general population [Sellors et al, 2000] since external genital warts may be a marker of a relative deficiency in immune response [Shlay et al, 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have evaluated psychosocial issues in patients with genital warts (Ward, Lowry, Houston, & Maw, 1994; Chandler, 1996), few have asked specifically about HPV. One study of women attending a well woman clinic in London found that subjects with a history of genital warts were more likely to have heard about HPV, but this study did not report on other HPV knowledge questions for this subgroup (Waller, McCaffery, Forrest, Szarewski, Cadman, & Wardle, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%