1994
DOI: 10.1002/mpo.2950220111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical epidural analgesia for a cancer child at home

Abstract: A cervical epidural catheter was placed in a 32-month-old girl suffering from painful bone metastases of a relapsing neuroblastoma in the left forearm. This therapeutic approach was chosen because oral morphine had failed to provide analgesia while producing intolerable side effects. The epidural injection of a mixture of morphine and bupivacaine provided complete analgesia with no side effects. This enabled the parents to take care of their child at home until the end, 35 days later.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 15 ] Cervical epidural analgesia is described in literature on cancer pain. [ 16 17 ] Techniques commonly used in continuous blockade of neural structures, such as subcutaneous tunneling and catheter fixation, use of bacterial filters, and general care of continuous catheters are recommended in such cases with advanced cancer. [ 16 18 ] A recent review of literature that examined cervical epidural analgesia in overall practice remained equivocal on its role while highlighting the need for careful selection of cases for this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] Cervical epidural analgesia is described in literature on cancer pain. [ 16 17 ] Techniques commonly used in continuous blockade of neural structures, such as subcutaneous tunneling and catheter fixation, use of bacterial filters, and general care of continuous catheters are recommended in such cases with advanced cancer. [ 16 18 ] A recent review of literature that examined cervical epidural analgesia in overall practice remained equivocal on its role while highlighting the need for careful selection of cases for this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%