1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11949.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical carcinoma in the Grampian region (1980–1991): a population‐based study of survival and cervical cytology history

Abstract: Objectives To study survival in women treated for cervical carcinoma in Grampian region, to identify clinical and pathological prognostic factors, and to correlate survival with cytology history. Design A retrospective study of all cases of cervical carcinoma using a prospectively gathered database. Data validated by 1 in 10 randomised retrospective case note sampling. Setting Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Subjects Three hundred and sixty‐three women resident within Grampian diagnosed as ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the patient material beyond stage IA was considered population based. Excluding stage IA, the remaining distribution between stages IB, II, III and IV, was 54%, 18%, 21% and 7%, respectively, quite similar to the stage distribution found in a similar populationbased study from Scotland (6). This favorable stage distribution is in contrast to the situation in third world countries, and may at least partly be due to early detection by cervical smears (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus the patient material beyond stage IA was considered population based. Excluding stage IA, the remaining distribution between stages IB, II, III and IV, was 54%, 18%, 21% and 7%, respectively, quite similar to the stage distribution found in a similar populationbased study from Scotland (6). This favorable stage distribution is in contrast to the situation in third world countries, and may at least partly be due to early detection by cervical smears (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Cervical cytological screening programmes have improved surveillance within target groups, from 66% in 1988 to 87% in 1994 (Dr Elizabeth MacKenzie, personal communication), which is reflected in the increased screening rates in our 1993 cervical carcinoma cohort. That screening is still not reaching all targeted groups is a cause for concern; the prognosis of cervical carcinoma has been shown to be significantly worse in the absence of previous cytology 8 and our data would suggest that a disproportionate number of cases of cervical carcinoma is now appearing from this small unscreened population. Of interest is the finding that 25% of patients presenting with primary cervical carcinoma are older than 65 years of age and therefore fall outside our screening programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Although the implication is that the other 46% never participated in the screening programmes, this conclusion cannot be made with any confidence based on an audit of this type. Indeed, previous smears may have been negative 5–8 . Cervical cytological screening programmes have improved surveillance within target groups, from 66% in 1988 to 87% in 1994 (Dr Elizabeth MacKenzie, personal communication), which is reflected in the increased screening rates in our 1993 cervical carcinoma cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the mean age of both micro-and frankly invasive cervical cancer is also declining with studies showing the mean age at diagnosis being at the early 30s and 40s respectively (1,2) . Therefore, it is not unusual for the clinician to deal with a diagnosis of microinvasive cervical cancer (FIGO, stage IA) (3) in women who have yet to complete their families.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%