2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12553-021-00554-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical cancer risk prediction with robust ensemble and explainable black boxes method

Abstract: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) that make use of algorithms based on intelligent systems, such as machine learning or deep learning, they suffer from the fact that often the methods used are hard to interpret and difficult to understand on how some decisions are made; the opacity of some methods, sometimes voluntary due to problems such as data privacy or the techniques used to protect intellectual property, makes these systems very complicated. Besides this series of problems, the results obtained al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify their dependability and efficacy, the frameworks were tested on six standard data sets, including breast, lung, prostate, colon, ovarian and cervical cancer. These data sets are freely available and continue to be utilized in the majority of contemporary investigations [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].  FS is a method for quickly picking the best features for NN training, possibly enhancing cancer prognostic prediction while also lowering the bulk of the input data to LSTM.…”
Section: Motivations and Contributions Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To verify their dependability and efficacy, the frameworks were tested on six standard data sets, including breast, lung, prostate, colon, ovarian and cervical cancer. These data sets are freely available and continue to be utilized in the majority of contemporary investigations [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].  FS is a method for quickly picking the best features for NN training, possibly enhancing cancer prognostic prediction while also lowering the bulk of the input data to LSTM.…”
Section: Motivations and Contributions Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of hidden layers and no. of neurons/layer) have been published [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Accordingly, this thought has been succeeded in the application of deep learning biomedical techniques, especially in case of large datasets which includes two important cases, initial and severe states of the diseases, that happens in all diseases.…”
Section: The Proposed Cancer Prediction Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although some similar systems have been previously developed for cervical cancer risk assessment, the number and types of input and output variables and the types of rules and algorithms used are different. According to the literature, machine learning algorithms to predict cervical cancer [ 17 ], artificial neural networks (ANNs) to combine the cytology and biomarker results [ 18 ], and ANNs to classify the normal and abnormal cells in the cervix region of the uterus [ 19 ] have been applied in previous studies. However, in these studies, the cytology results were the main input variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%