2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Assessment With Progesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Strategy Based On Cost-Effectiveness

Abstract: ing an additional unintended pregnancy with ulipristal acetate as compared to levonorgestrel is estimated to be 418€ . Ulipristal acetate is most cost-effective in the subgroup of intake within 24 hours, where it is more efficacious at a lower cost compared to levonorgestrel. ConClusions: Ulipristal acetate is a cost-effective alternative to levonorgestrel, given that the cost of avoiding an additional pregnancy with ulipristal acetate is less than the average cost of said pregnancies. Therefore, French minors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, clinicians should continue to perform universal transvaginal CL screening at 18–24 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton gestation, and to offer vaginal progesterone to those with a CL ≤ 25 mm, regardless of their history of spontaneous preterm birth, with the goal of preventing preterm birth and reducing neonatal morbidity and mortality. This recommendation is buttressed by the safety margin of vaginal progesterone and the cost‐effectiveness of the intervention. We believe that an IPD meta‐analysis including data from the OPPTIMUM trial and the Dutch study is warranted to enable a more rigorous analysis and the performance of several subgroup analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, clinicians should continue to perform universal transvaginal CL screening at 18–24 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton gestation, and to offer vaginal progesterone to those with a CL ≤ 25 mm, regardless of their history of spontaneous preterm birth, with the goal of preventing preterm birth and reducing neonatal morbidity and mortality. This recommendation is buttressed by the safety margin of vaginal progesterone and the cost‐effectiveness of the intervention. We believe that an IPD meta‐analysis including data from the OPPTIMUM trial and the Dutch study is warranted to enable a more rigorous analysis and the performance of several subgroup analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…135144 Moreover, emerging evidence from recent studies conducted in hospitals located in the United States 144146 and 1 Australian state 147 suggests that the implementation of universal cervical length screening and vaginal progesterone administration to patients with a sonographic short cervix is associated with a significant reduction in the rates of preterm birth. Several of these studies included women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is strong evidence indicating that universal transvaginal sonographic CL screening and vaginal progesterone administration for women with a short cervix is a cost-effective intervention to prevent preterm birth and associated morbidity and mortality, regardless of the cutoff used to define a short cervix in the decision and economic analyses (≤15 mm, 5759 ≤20 mm, 60 ≤25 mm, 57,61,62 10–20 mm, 63 or 10–30 mm 64 ). Moreover, the analysis of Combs 65 provided compelling evidence that this strategy satisfies the 10 criteria that the World Health Organization considers to be a good screening test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%