2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certified normal: Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and normative estimates of cognitive functioning

Abstract: Normative samples drawn from older populations may unintentionally include individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, resulting in reduced means, increased variability, and overestimation of age-effects on cognitive performance. 264 cognitively normal (CDR=0) older adults were classified as biomarker-negative (“Robust Normal,” n=177) or biomarker-positive (“Preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease” (PCAD), n=87) based on amyloid imaging, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and hippocampal volumes. PCA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only procedure that may allow an actual refutation should necessarily rely on the use of amyloid deposition markers to rule out the influence of prodromal or even preclinical AD cases. Consequently, this is a very important (see [77-79]) but not the only limitation of our study. The sample was relatively small, particularly the control-low group (see also the reduced number of younger APOE4 carriers), limiting the generalization of the present results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The only procedure that may allow an actual refutation should necessarily rely on the use of amyloid deposition markers to rule out the influence of prodromal or even preclinical AD cases. Consequently, this is a very important (see [77-79]) but not the only limitation of our study. The sample was relatively small, particularly the control-low group (see also the reduced number of younger APOE4 carriers), limiting the generalization of the present results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous SuperAger findings combined with our own finding of biomarker differences among Optimal versus Typical Memory Performers and Optimal Maintainers versus Non-Maintainers suggests that a certain proportion of what is considered “normal age-related decline” is in fact potentially pathological. In vivo imaging of amyloid and more recently tau, provides an unprecedented opportunity to improve normative data by incorporating biomarker-corrected normative data (Hassenstab et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-depth descriptions have been published elsewhere (Aschenbrenner et al, 2015a; Johnson et al, 2009). Tests of memory and attention were selected as both have previously shown to be sensitive to preclinical levels of pathology (Aschenbrenner et al, 2015a, 2015b; Hassenstab et al, 2016; Monsell et al, 2014)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%