“…The United States of America, Canada and diverse LatinoAmerican countries manage to indirectly control real estate price and rent levels (Rebelo, 2009a) through different taxation devices on surplus-values -that span from the traditional taxes to development rates, using different percentages and taxation basis, and resorting to diverse urban policy regulations. Even the development licenses issued by planning responsible people -that may either be more flexible or more rigid, accurate and predictable 6 -shape investments, market characteristics, and the values of the urban built environment (Tang et al, 2000). Different planning systems rely on free market performance, despite bounded by municipal interventions -in what concerns, namely, development of urban land, public housing provision, and private property development -, as is the case of Hong Kong (Schiffer, 1983(Schiffer, , 1991Smart, 1990;Cuthbert, 1991a,b;Lai, 1995;Booth, 1996;Yu, 1997;Tang et al, 2000) and Portugal (Pardal, 2006).…”