2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certain subclasses of multivalent functions associated with a family of linear operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This proves the assertion (3.2). Following the same lines as in Theorem 4 [12], we can prove that inf{Re(q(z))} = q(−1). The proof of Theorem 3.1 is thus completed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This proves the assertion (3.2). Following the same lines as in Theorem 4 [12], we can prove that inf{Re(q(z))} = q(−1). The proof of Theorem 3.1 is thus completed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…By employing the same method as in the proof of Theorem 4 and Theorem 5 in [15], we may obtain the following theorems (Theorem 1.8 and Theorem 1.9) stated below. …”
Section: Andq(z) Is the Best Dominant Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cho et al [3] established some inclusion relationships and argument properties for certain subclasses of A p , which were defined in terms of their operator I λ p (a, c)(see also [18]). For the choices λ = c = 1 and a = n + p, the Cho-Kwon-Srivastava operator I λ p (a, c) reduces to the operator I 1 p (n + p, 1) = I n,p (n > −p), where I n,p is the integral operator studied by Liu and Noor [9](for details, see [10] and [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%