2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Certain improvements of Newton’s method with fourth-order convergence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not insert numerical results obtained by iterative methods of lower computational efficiency since these methods are not competitive and their lower rank is predictable. Another optimal two-point methods of the fourth order with the efficiency index 4 1/3 were considered in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], but the cited papers do not exhaust all sources.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not insert numerical results obtained by iterative methods of lower computational efficiency since these methods are not competitive and their lower rank is predictable. Another optimal two-point methods of the fourth order with the efficiency index 4 1/3 were considered in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], but the cited papers do not exhaust all sources.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1 À b k f 0 (a) = O(e kÀ1 ) (see (20)), from a relation similar to (21) we obtain e kþ1 $ e 4 k e 2 kÀ1 :…”
Section: Methods (Ii)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We present some numerical test results for various fourth-order iterative schemes in Table 4. We compare our method with King's method with β = 3 [13] (KM), Kou's method [14] (KouM) and fourth order Chun's method [5](CM).…”
Section: − −mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For numerical illustrations in this section we used the fixed stopping criterion ǫ < 10 −25 . We used the test functions given in [5,15,22]. We present some numerical test results for various fourth-order iterative schemes in Table 4.…”
Section: − −mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation