Ecology and Conservation of Mountaintop Grasslands in Brazil 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29808-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerrado to Rupestrian Grasslands: Patterns of Species Distribution and the Forces Shaping Them Along an Altitudinal Gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
65
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
4
65
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the richness and abundance of sap‐sucking insects were higher at the intermediate elevation, whereas for chewing insects they were higher at the highest elevation. These results are in contrast to studies on other insect groups in the study area, such as dung beetles, termites and ants (Fernandes et al ), and on a multi‐taxa community on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Peters et al ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the richness and abundance of sap‐sucking insects were higher at the intermediate elevation, whereas for chewing insects they were higher at the highest elevation. These results are in contrast to studies on other insect groups in the study area, such as dung beetles, termites and ants (Fernandes et al ), and on a multi‐taxa community on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Peters et al ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Climatic variation along the sampled elevation gradient (e.g. precipitation and temperature) (see Fernandes et al ) may affect the availability and quality of host plants and promote changes in the networks of interactions (see Rasmann et al ; Dáttilo & Rico‐Gray ) as found in our study. Our results are similar to those found in studies conducted in the Chilean Andes and mountains in eastern Australia, where the number of interactions (plant–pollinator system) decreased with increasing elevation (Ramos‐Jiliberto et al ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations