2005
DOI: 10.1081/lpr-64523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebrovascular Involvement in Liposome—Induced Cardiopulmonary Distress in Pigs

Abstract: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, 14. ABSTRACT Intravenous administration of liposomes, including Doxil, can ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 lists 30 experimental studies [15, which utilized the pig model to analyze the cardiopulmonary adverse effects of different nanoparticles (NPs) or other agents. Some of these studies highlighted the concordance of HSR symptoms in pigs and hypersensitive patients [25][26][27][28][29]32,33,[46][47][48], others addressed the mechanism of HSRs [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]36,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47], and yet others focused on the prevention of HSRs by pharmacological intervention [15], or by optimizing the structure [24,44] or administration protocol [24,37,48] of NPs. Importantly, many of these studies were initiated mainly for preclinical safety evaluation of nanomedicines [15,22,23,30,31,35,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 lists 30 experimental studies [15, which utilized the pig model to analyze the cardiopulmonary adverse effects of different nanoparticles (NPs) or other agents. Some of these studies highlighted the concordance of HSR symptoms in pigs and hypersensitive patients [25][26][27][28][29]32,33,[46][47][48], others addressed the mechanism of HSRs [15,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]36,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47], and yet others focused on the prevention of HSRs by pharmacological intervention [15], or by optimizing the structure [24,44] or administration protocol [24,37,48] of NPs. Importantly, many of these studies were initiated mainly for preclinical safety evaluation of nanomedicines [15,22,23,30,31,35,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon the above-mentioned facts, we hypothesized the involvement of cerebrovascular change during liposome infusion. Further details see [54,111]. This study can be an animal model of human vasospam.…”
Section: Clinical Background: Liposome Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies [ 31 , 32 ] made an initial effort to establish pathophysiological correlates to REG [ 30 , 34 ] but did not mention CBF AR. Previous studies documented that REG reflects cerebrovascular reactivity [ 40 ], has a correlation to ICP [ 35 , 38 ], laser Doppler flow [ 39 ], carotid flow [ 40 ] and can be used for patient monitoring instead of ICP [ 42 ]. It was documented that REG indicated cerebral vasospasm before systemic reaction caused by complement activation/cytokine storm in pigs [ 42 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies documented that REG reflects cerebrovascular reactivity [ 40 ], has a correlation to ICP [ 35 , 38 ], laser Doppler flow [ 39 ], carotid flow [ 40 ] and can be used for patient monitoring instead of ICP [ 42 ]. It was documented that REG indicated cerebral vasospasm before systemic reaction caused by complement activation/cytokine storm in pigs [ 42 ]. We described multimodal CBF AR changes during hemorrhage and various SAP changes in pigs [ 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%