2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgM test in routine practice: Comparison with quantitative assessment of intrathecal IgM synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major debate regards the best method for detecting the ITMS. A recent study confirmed that the quantitative method described by Reiber is specific (97.6%) but with low sensitivity (23%) compared to qualitative detection [27]. Our analysis confirms this finding, as the prevalence of ITMS was consistently higher when detected with qualitative methods (OCMBs or LS-OCMBs).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A major debate regards the best method for detecting the ITMS. A recent study confirmed that the quantitative method described by Reiber is specific (97.6%) but with low sensitivity (23%) compared to qualitative detection [27]. Our analysis confirms this finding, as the prevalence of ITMS was consistently higher when detected with qualitative methods (OCMBs or LS-OCMBs).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The prevalence of IgG OCBs was lower in CIS than in RRMS (80.5% versus 91.0%, p < 0.05). We excluded the studies that referred to the 2017 revision of McDonald criteria [ 8 , 27 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] as sensitivity analyses. The results did not change (CIS versus RRMS patients, 23.9% 338/1412 vs. 42.3% 412/973, p < 0.00001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, LS-OCMB showed a greater value than Reibergram, and this difference might probably be explained by the already reported lower sensitivity of Reibergram compared with OCMB. 47,48 A positive Reibergram has strongly been associated with worse outcomes, 21,[26][27][28] but their higher percentage of falsenegative results compared with OCMB may diminish its utility. 48 Compared with OCMB, LS-OCMB may identify more accurately those patients at a higher risk of early disability by the fact that OCMB might be due to transient immune activation while LS-OCMB a sustained IgM response associated with CD5 + B cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%