2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral saturation in cardiac arrest patients measured with near-infrared technology during pre-hospital advanced life support. Results from Copernicus I cohort study

Abstract: Regional cerebral saturation measurements can be used during pre-hospital ALS as an additional marker to predict ROSC. An increase of at least 15% in rSO during ALS is associated with a higher probability of ROSC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decrease could be explained by the onset of different pathophysiological mechanisms after cardiac arrest. During 5 min of CPR, a steep increase in S ct O 2 was observed, which is likely to be related the initiation of CPR, as described in a previous study (32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This decrease could be explained by the onset of different pathophysiological mechanisms after cardiac arrest. During 5 min of CPR, a steep increase in S ct O 2 was observed, which is likely to be related the initiation of CPR, as described in a previous study (32).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The proportion of pre-hospital time with successful monitoring (>70%) was 71.4% (45 of 63) for all three sensors, with at least two sensors functional in 90.4% (57 of 63). The median (interquartile range) scene time was 19 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) minutes in patients with NIRS monitoring compared to 18 (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) minutes without NIRS monitoring (P = .570). There was no difference in the median (interquartile range) total pre-hospital time between patients with or without monitoring sensors (72 [59-89] versus 72 [59-80] minutes; P = .605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For time spent at the scene, there was no difference between the three patient groups (Table 1); patients with or without NIRS monitoring also had similar scene times (P = .570). In the sensitivity analysis, the median (IQR) scene time for those with sensors applied who met the inclusion criteria (n = 53) was 19 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) with no difference between patients with and without NIRS monitoring (P = .867). For total pre-hospital time, there was no difference between the three patient groups (Table 1); patients with or without NIRS monitoring also had similar total pre-hospital time (P = .605).…”
Section: Re Sultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pre‐hospital NIRS monitoring has been applied almost exclusively in out of hospital cardiac arrest patients during ongoing resuscitation, whilst the results of these studies support the feasibility of NIRS monitoring and its value in detecting return of spontaneous circulation . Patients with major trauma with and without traumatic brain injury patients may of course differ, especially concerning the possible presence of treatable intracranial lesions that may increase intracranial pressure and hamper cerebral perfusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%