2020
DOI: 10.1002/ams2.528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral oxygenation monitoring during resuscitation by emergency medical technicians: a prospective multicenter observational study

Abstract: To assess the feasibility and predictive ability of regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by emergency medical technicians. Methods: This prospective observational study included 33 cardiac arrest patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a prehospital setting. Patients were connected to a near-infrared spectrometer through two disposable probes immediately after entering the ambulance. The monitor, which showed regional cerebral oxygen saturation read… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conflict of interest: None. Shunichiro Nakao, 1 Tomoya Hirose, 1 Mitsuo Ohnishi, 2 and Tadahiko Shiozaki 1…”
Section: Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Conflict of interest: None. Shunichiro Nakao, 1 Tomoya Hirose, 1 Mitsuo Ohnishi, 2 and Tadahiko Shiozaki 1…”
Section: Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dear Editor, We read with interest the recently published article by Hamanaka et al 1 These authors reported that the increase in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) monitored by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) was higher in patients who survived more than 90 days than those who did not, although the increase was not statistically significant. We would like to discuss three issues from their article regarding their methodology, an illogical leap in the conclusions, and an insufficient literature search.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations