Medical Imaging 2018: Computer-Aided Diagnosis 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2294016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral microbleed detection in traumatic brain injury patients using 3D convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In classification tasks, cross-entropy loss is usually employed. This was also used in previous works on CMB detection ( Dou et al, 2016 , Standvoss et al, 2018 , Liu et al, 2019 ). Both cross-entropy (CE) and Dice loss are commonly used for training segmentation networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In classification tasks, cross-entropy loss is usually employed. This was also used in previous works on CMB detection ( Dou et al, 2016 , Standvoss et al, 2018 , Liu et al, 2019 ). Both cross-entropy (CE) and Dice loss are commonly used for training segmentation networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Liu et al (2019) trained and evaluated a system for a variety of CMB populations, including a cohort of mild TBI patients. Standvoss et al (2018) investigated the use of CNNs in moderate to severe TBI cases in a smaller cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method had a sensitivity of 93% and outperformed prior methods of detection. Standvoss et al [ 87 ] detected CMBs in traumatic brain injury. In their study, the authors prepared three types of 3D architectures with varying depths, i.e., three, five and eight layers.…”
Section: Applications In 3d Medical Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and attained 93.05% performance accuracy for their findings. Standvoss et al [23] utilized the RF model for the detection of CMBs from MRI and achieved a sensitivity of 92.0%. Another group of researchers [24] also utilized the random forest model for traumatic brain injury diagnosis and achieved 89.1% performance accuracy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%