1972
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.22.1.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral dominance in relation to tracking and tapping performance in patients with parkinsonism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, each EFE was displayed concurrent with a Corsi Blocks trial. processing, the interference in our study may have been particularly strong [33,34] since two visuo-spatial tasks were used. This may have led to cognitive overload in these patients that was reflected in a poorer performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After that, each EFE was displayed concurrent with a Corsi Blocks trial. processing, the interference in our study may have been particularly strong [33,34] since two visuo-spatial tasks were used. This may have led to cognitive overload in these patients that was reflected in a poorer performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, it has been suggested that all types of facial recognition, with or without emotional content, are dependent upon visuo-spatial resources [28][29][30][31][32]. Like frontal lobe tasks, PD patients were found to have visuo-perceptual disorders and difficulties in visual tracking tests have been confirmed in PD patients [33,34], some of which may be attributed to deficits in visuo-spatial memory [35][36][37]. Significantly, abnormalities in facial perception have been cited as one of the sequelae of PD [38], suggesting that the underlying problem is a visuo-spatial dysfunction [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of previous studies, right hand superiority had been expected, especially since the test procedure seemed to favor the right hand, allowing right hand first untimed practice and then timing DIFFERENCE I \ in order of right-left-left-right. The most consistently significant right superiority has been reported in tasks requiring repetitive movements of fingers, hands or arms (Wyke 1967(Wyke , 1969Spreen and Gaddes 1969;Bowen et at. 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untimed practice (invariably done with the right hand) and invariable right-leftleft-right order of trials admittedly appeared to confer a certain practice advantage on the right hand, but the purpose of this normative study was simply to provide a standardized procedure of measurement and not to question right hand superiority (the question arose a posteriori: see results and discussion). This order has also been used in other studies of finger oscillation or tapping (Bowen et al 1972).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowen et al [3] measured the performance of patients with Parkin son's disease in two motor tasks -repetitive tapping of a button and tracking a light moving at random on a screen. They reported that pa tients with primarily right-sided symptoms (left hemispheric dysfunction) had bimanual alteration in both the tapping and the tracking tasks, whereas patients with primarily left-sided symptoms (right hemispheric dysfunction) performed significantly worse than the controls on the tap ping test only with the hand contralateral to the major brain damage.…”
Section: Effect Of the Position Changementioning
confidence: 99%