2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-01186-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral Autoregulation: The Concept the Legend the Promise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, cerebrovascular reactivity and the factors affecting it are regrettably still poorly known [ 24 ]. Previously, modification and optimization of CVR in brain injury and ICH by altering blood pressure and ventilation have been described in the literature [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, cerebrovascular reactivity and the factors affecting it are regrettably still poorly known [ 24 ]. Previously, modification and optimization of CVR in brain injury and ICH by altering blood pressure and ventilation have been described in the literature [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical results for CVR may not be applicable to patients monitored with other NIRS equipment as proprietary algorithms and optode designs to avoid extracranial contamination of the signal [ 44 ] generate different results [ 40 ]. The retrospective, observational design of this study means that no causal inferences may be made, and the results should be viewed to demonstrate associations and generate hypotheses for future investigation with TOx a potential clinical heuristic [ 24 ]. Comparisons of CVR in the COMACARE study with a cohort of healthy volunteers, while intended in the published protocol [ 19 ], were abandoned because of significant and unreconcilable incongruities in monitoring time and resolution, NIRS equipment and the degree and origin of MAP variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A MAP below the LLA (e.g., 50 mm Hg) increases the risk of cerebral ischemia; comparatively, a MAP above the ULA (e.g., 150 mm Hg) increases the risk of cerebral hyperemia [18][19][20]. However, contemporary data challenges the traditional dogmatic view of CA and suggests that the CA plateau, should it truly exist, is far narrower than traditionally reported and is individual specific [21,22]. Furthermore, changes in CBF remain highly susceptible to various physiological and clinical alterations, such as physical manipulations (i.e., head-up tilt) and vasoactive drugs [21].…”
Section: Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, changes in CBF remain highly susceptible to various physiological and clinical alterations, such as physical manipulations (i.e., head-up tilt) and vasoactive drugs [21]. The protective response of the cerebral vasculature is now thought to be dependent on not only the speed at which MAP changes but also the directionality of the change [21,22]. Alterations in the limits and mechanisms of CA in neonates and infants remain incompletely understood.…”
Section: Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, no single method has been universally accepted as a gold standard. This may be a consequence of the limited reproducibility of the analytical methods (Sanders et al 2018, Lazaridis 2021. In a series of multicenter studies, coordinated by the CARNet, the reproducibility of the main parameters available to quantify CA was assessed (Meel-van den Abeelen et al 2014, Sanders et al 2018, Sanders et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%