2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral autoregulation and ageing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CBF during mild-to-moderate intensity exercise: influence of age Despite no disturbances to total cerebral oxygen consumption with healthy aging, there is a progressive decline in CBF (approximately 28-50%) from 30 to 70 years of age (Yam et al 2005;Ainslie et al 2008;Fisher et al 2008;Ogoh and Ainslie 2009) that is associated with global cerebral atrophy Buijs et al 1998). In contrast to healthy YA, as mentioned, only two studies (Fisher et al 2008;Heckmann et al 2003) have examined CBF in middle-aged OA during mild-to-moderate exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBF during mild-to-moderate intensity exercise: influence of age Despite no disturbances to total cerebral oxygen consumption with healthy aging, there is a progressive decline in CBF (approximately 28-50%) from 30 to 70 years of age (Yam et al 2005;Ainslie et al 2008;Fisher et al 2008;Ogoh and Ainslie 2009) that is associated with global cerebral atrophy Buijs et al 1998). In contrast to healthy YA, as mentioned, only two studies (Fisher et al 2008;Heckmann et al 2003) have examined CBF in middle-aged OA during mild-to-moderate exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With healthy aging, there is a progressive decline in CBF (approx: 28-50%) from 30 to 70 years of age (Yam et al 2005;Ainslie et al 2008;Fisher et al 2008;Ogoh and Ainslie 2009). Such declines are caused by global cerebral atrophy without any disturbance in cerebral oxygen consumption Buijs et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A difference in the Mx of [ 0.3 in patients with head injury showed clinical relevance, 9 while in another study comparing young vs old patients, a difference in the Mx of 0.1 was assumed to be clinically irrelevant. 10 Furthermore, the standard deviation in previously reported studies was about 0.2. 10,11 Consequently, in the present study, a change in Mx of C 0.2 between baseline and CVVHD measurement was defined as clinically relevant.…”
Section: Cvvhdmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…10 Furthermore, the standard deviation in previously reported studies was about 0.2. 10,11 Consequently, in the present study, a change in Mx of C 0.2 between baseline and CVVHD measurement was defined as clinically relevant. The null hypothesis of the equivalence test states that the Mx changes by [ 0.2; the alternative hypothesis maintains that this change is \ 0.2.…”
Section: Cvvhdmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation