2022
DOI: 10.1002/ana.26481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and the Risk of Hematoma Expansion

Abstract: Objective: We assessed whether hematoma expansion (HE) and favorable outcome differ according to type of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Methods: Among participants with ICH enrolled in the TICH-2 (Tranexamic Acid for Hyperacute Primary Intracerebral Haemorrhage) trial, we assessed baseline scans for hematoma location and presence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) using computed tomography (CT, simplified Edinburgh criteria) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Boston criteria) and categorized ICH as lobar … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that the ICH score, GCS score, irregular shape, uneven density, IVH relation and surgery were related to the outcomes of intracranial hemorrhage patients. Some scholars have reported that intracranial hemorrhage patient prognosis is related to age, GCS score, blood pressure, hematoma location and volume [15,16], intraventricular hemorrhage, use of anticoagulation drugs, hematoma expansion [17] and some inflammatory factors [18], which is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results showed that the ICH score, GCS score, irregular shape, uneven density, IVH relation and surgery were related to the outcomes of intracranial hemorrhage patients. Some scholars have reported that intracranial hemorrhage patient prognosis is related to age, GCS score, blood pressure, hematoma location and volume [15,16], intraventricular hemorrhage, use of anticoagulation drugs, hematoma expansion [17] and some inflammatory factors [18], which is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Dichotomising ICH location as either lobar or non-lobar may risk over-simplifying the underlying aetiology given that lobar ICH comprises CAA-related ICH, hypertensive arteriolopathy and mixed cerebral small vessel disease 18. Recently, a detailed secondary imaging analysis of TICH-2 demonstrated that in participants with lobar CAA-related ICH, there was an increased risk of haematoma expansion with increasing time from randomisation, while the risk of haematoma expansion was constant irrespective of baseline haematoma volume 19. These effects were not seen in those with non-CAA lobar or non-lobar ICH and may suggest a difference in haematoma dynamics between these ICH groups 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a detailed secondary imaging analysis of TICH-2 demonstrated that in participants with lobar CAA-related ICH, there was an increased risk of haematoma expansion with increasing time from randomisation, while the risk of haematoma expansion was constant irrespective of baseline haematoma volume 19. These effects were not seen in those with non-CAA lobar or non-lobar ICH and may suggest a difference in haematoma dynamics between these ICH groups 19. CAA-related bleeding may originate from leptomeningeal vessels and have more space to expand into (including the subarachnoid space), resulting in prolonged, slower, lower pressure bleeding over several hours 19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation