2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00195-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral activation by the signals ascending through unmyelinated C-fibers in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Activation in the primary somatosensory cortex following A and C fiber activation is still a matter of controversy [17][18][19]. By contrast, a clear difference was found using fMRI [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation in the primary somatosensory cortex following A and C fiber activation is still a matter of controversy [17][18][19]. By contrast, a clear difference was found using fMRI [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser beams applied to a tiny area [4,7,9,28,31,35] have been used to selectively activate C fibers, which is considered difficult to do with electrical stimulation, since C fibers generally have a high threshold to electrical stimulation. However, the present results indicate that this threshold is not so high when appropriate parameters are chosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques (for review, see [1]) have been used to investigate C fiber-related cerebral processing [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] as well as conduction velocity (CV) [9], each with its own strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parietal operculum (SII) rather than the anterior insula was found to be involved with raised heat pain thresholds in 6 stroke patients with involvement of SII and/or anterior insula [22], while a patient with a tumour involving the parietal operculum and posterior insula (subsequently removed) had interference with both mechanical and thermal pain sensations [23]. The ipsi- and contralateral parietal opercula were shown to be activated by unspecified painful stimuli [24, 25], a finding endorsed by others; in view of this, it must be emphasized that when CPSP occurs as a result of an SII-insular lesion, the symptoms are always contralateral to the damage. Painful stimuli were shown to activate the opercular (SII) cortex and insula sequentially [26], with a delay of about 50 ms. Jones et al [27] have recently shown that there is a reduction in opioid receptor binding in the insula of patients with central neuropathic pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%