1982
DOI: 10.1159/000121612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebello-Olivary Projections in the Rat

Abstract: Projections of deep cerebellar nuclei onto the inferior olive have been studied using autoradiographic methods in adult Wistar rats: the distribution of the labelling consequent to injections of tritiated amino acids, limited to one of the cerebellar nuclei, was mapped in the inferior olive. Each of the four cerebellar deep nuclei project to a specific region of the contralateral inferior olive. Only caudal parts of the medial cerebellar nucleus send fibres to the olive, where they reach the caudal half of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were also obtained by Rispal-Padci et al [171. These physiological findings are in agreement with the ana tomical description of cerebellar projections to the VL [18,19]. …”
Section: Convergent Inputs From the Interpositus And The Dentate Nuclsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar results were also obtained by Rispal-Padci et al [171. These physiological findings are in agreement with the ana tomical description of cerebellar projections to the VL [18,19]. …”
Section: Convergent Inputs From the Interpositus And The Dentate Nuclsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the 'dorsolateral hump' (DLH) of Good man et al [1963] was considered a part of the NL [Angaut and Cicirata, 1982]. The delineation of magno-(NRm) and parvocellular (NRp) subdivi sions of the NR described here agrees with that of Reid et al [1975].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although our data in rats seem to correspond to the cortical subdivision of the lateral cortex reported in cats, the cortical region which pro jects to DLH could not be simply identified as the D1 zone from its location, as in cats, because of the dis agreement regarding the classification of DLH as a component of the interpositus or lateral nuclei. With respect to its fiber connections [24,25], DLH should be considered a component of LN. Therefore, the re gion that projects to DLH should be included in the D zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%