2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Change Vestibulospinal Function

Abstract: Background: The cerebellum strongly contributes to vestibulospinal function, and the modulation of vestibulospinal function is important for rehabilitation. As transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation may induce functional changes in neural systems, we investigated whether cerebellar repetitive TMS (crTMS) and noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (nGVS) could modulate vestibulospinal response excitability. We also sought to determine whether crTMS could influence the effect of nGVS. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rubber foam can make somatosensory input from feet unreliable and also generates mechanical consequences for balance control (Horak et al, 1990 ; Macedo et al, 2015 ), and vestibular contribution to postural control can be increased (Fujimoto et al, 2009 ). nGVS can modulate the threshold of the vestibular response (Kwan et al, 2019 ) against the signals from head movements and the excitability of the vestibulospinal response (Matsugi et al, 2020 ). Therefore, one possible mechanism of increment of body sway by nGVS (1 mA), if the stimulus intensity is in supratidal, is the increase in the threshold of the vestibulospinal response for postural control because the contaminating intensive noise stimulation generally disturbs signal detection (Fallon et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Rubber foam can make somatosensory input from feet unreliable and also generates mechanical consequences for balance control (Horak et al, 1990 ; Macedo et al, 2015 ), and vestibular contribution to postural control can be increased (Fujimoto et al, 2009 ). nGVS can modulate the threshold of the vestibular response (Kwan et al, 2019 ) against the signals from head movements and the excitability of the vestibulospinal response (Matsugi et al, 2020 ). Therefore, one possible mechanism of increment of body sway by nGVS (1 mA), if the stimulus intensity is in supratidal, is the increase in the threshold of the vestibulospinal response for postural control because the contaminating intensive noise stimulation generally disturbs signal detection (Fallon et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1A shows the stimulation setup, and Figure 1B shows the typical waveform of nGVS. nGVS was conducted in almost the same way as in a previous study (Inukai et al, 2018b ; Matsugi et al, 2020 ). nGVS was delivered via Ag/AgCl surface electrodes affixed to the right and left mastoid processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations