2002
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00528.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar Nodulectomy Impairs Spatial Memory of Vestibular and Optokinetic Stimulation in Rabbits

Abstract: . Cerebellar nodulectomy impairs spatial memory of vestibular and optokinetic stimulation in rabbits. J Neurophysiol 87: 962-975, 2002; 10.1152/jn.00528.2001. Natural vestibular and optokinetic stimulation were used to investigate the possible role of the cerebellar nodulus in the regulation and modification of reflexive eye movements in rabbits. The nodulus and folium 9d of the uvula were destroyed by surgical aspiration. Before and after nodulectomy the vertical and horizontal vestibuloocular reflexes (VVOR,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that the cerebellar uvula and nodulus receives three different types of vestibular inputs: vestibular climbing fibers inputs from the contralateral inferior olive (Barmack and Shojaku 1995), and the primary and secondary vestibular mossy fiber inputs (Brodal and Høivik 1964; Korte and Mugnaini 1979; Carleton and Carpenter 1984; Epema et al 1985; Newlands et al 2002; Maklad and Fritzsch 2003a). They integrate information from these three sources and project back to VCN (Chan-Palay et al 1979; Epema et al 1985; Shojaku et al 1987; de Zeeuw and Berrebi 1996; Wylie et al 1999) to regulate spatial orientation, spatial memory, and reflexive eye movements (Ito et al 1970, 1971; Angelaki and Hess 1995; Barmack et al 2002; Cohen et al 2002). Our findings suggest that the primary afferent input is oppositely tuned from secondary vestibular mossy fibers inputs, but it is not clear how these oppositely tuned inputs are integrated in the vestibulocerebellum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the cerebellar uvula and nodulus receives three different types of vestibular inputs: vestibular climbing fibers inputs from the contralateral inferior olive (Barmack and Shojaku 1995), and the primary and secondary vestibular mossy fiber inputs (Brodal and Høivik 1964; Korte and Mugnaini 1979; Carleton and Carpenter 1984; Epema et al 1985; Newlands et al 2002; Maklad and Fritzsch 2003a). They integrate information from these three sources and project back to VCN (Chan-Palay et al 1979; Epema et al 1985; Shojaku et al 1987; de Zeeuw and Berrebi 1996; Wylie et al 1999) to regulate spatial orientation, spatial memory, and reflexive eye movements (Ito et al 1970, 1971; Angelaki and Hess 1995; Barmack et al 2002; Cohen et al 2002). Our findings suggest that the primary afferent input is oppositely tuned from secondary vestibular mossy fibers inputs, but it is not clear how these oppositely tuned inputs are integrated in the vestibulocerebellum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the head is in the initial orientation, the nystagmus is produced by the horizontal and medial rectus muscles. When the head is pitched, nystagmus in the same plane, and generated by the same stimulus, is produced by the vertical rectus and oblique muscles (Barmack et al 2002). This efficient reweighting indicates an important symmetry in the optokinetic system.…”
Section: Neural Organization Projects Vestibular Spacementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Their results show that reflex pathways can be reweighted so that the postural response to the same stimulus utilizes different movements of the torso and lower limbs to achieve compensation in the pointing direction of the head or gaze. An oculomotor example of symmetric reweighting appears in the modulation of optokinetic nystagmus by pitch rotation of the head (Barmack et al 2002). In these experiments it was shown that horizontal optokinetic stimulation generates horizontal nystagmus in the rabbit, regardless of the pitch orientation of the animal's head.…”
Section: Neural Organization Projects Vestibular Spacementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alternatively, it may be a consequence of nystagmus reorientation (Angelaki and Hess 1994). “Velocity dumping” can be altered without affecting nystagmus reorientation in nodulectomized rabbits (Barmack et al 2002) and monkeys (Wearne et al 1998). Consequently, spatiotemporal transformation may not require “velocity dumping,” at least for optokinetically evoked eye movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%