2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11689-010-9058-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar-dependent delay eyeblink conditioning in adolescents with Specific Language Impairment

Abstract: Cerebellar impairments have been hypothesized as part of the pathogenesis of Specific Language Impairment (SLI), although direct evidence of cerebellar involvement is sparse. Eyeblink Conditioning (EBC) is a learning task with well documented cerebellar pathways. This is the first study of EBC in affected adolescents and controls. 16 adolescent controls, 15 adolescents with SLI, and 12 adult controls participated in a delay EBC task. Affected children had low general language performance, grammatical deficits … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on their findings, Zelaznik and Goffman did not find evidence of cerebellar disfunction in children with SLI. Their conclusions are further supported by recent studies of typical eyeblink conditioning in children with SLI, a task that also relies heavily on the cerebellum (Hardiman, Hsu, & Bishop, 2013; Steinmetz & Rice, 2010). …”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Based on their findings, Zelaznik and Goffman did not find evidence of cerebellar disfunction in children with SLI. Their conclusions are further supported by recent studies of typical eyeblink conditioning in children with SLI, a task that also relies heavily on the cerebellum (Hardiman, Hsu, & Bishop, 2013; Steinmetz & Rice, 2010). …”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Both children and adults with dyslexia showed similar implicit learning to controls in non-sequential contextual cueing tasks 29, 30, 31. Children with SLI also show learning similar to that of age-matched controls in other non-sequential procedural learning tasks such as the pursuit rotor task ([7], but see [32]); they do not differ from controls in eyeblink conditioning , which engages corticocerebellar circuits 33, 34. However, a sequential learning deficit cannot explain all the evidence.…”
Section: Specificity Of Learning Difficulties In Developmental Languamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This type of delay conditioning occurs without explicit awareness of the relationship between the tone and the puff of air and therefore is presumably a type of procedural learning (although some controversy exists regarding this point; see Lovibond, Liu, Weidemann, & Mitchell, 2011). Neither Hardiman and colleagues (2013) nor Steinmetz and Rice (2010) identified impaired procedural learning in children with SLI on this task. Children with SLI also demonstrate comparable performance to their typically developing, age-matched peers on the pursuit rotor task, a procedural learning task that does not require sequential processing (Hsu & Bishop, 2014).…”
Section: Specifying the Role Of Procedural Learning In Slimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies have assessed the functional integrity of the cerebellum in children with SLI through a delay eyeblink conditioning task (Hardiman, Hsu, & Bishop, 2013;Steinmetz & Rice, 2010). In this task, repeated pairings of a conditioned stimulus (such as a tone) with an unconditioned stimulus (a puff of air to the cornea) eventually elicits a conditioned eyeblink response just prior to the presentation of the unconditioned stimulus.…”
Section: Specifying the Role Of Procedural Learning In Slimentioning
confidence: 99%