Handbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23810-0_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar Control of Eye Movements

Abstract: One of the earliest consensuses reached by cerebellar physiologists is that an intact cerebellum is necessary for optimal motor performance. But how and where motor commands get adjusted to the defies of a perceptual error due to adversities in motor execution remains elusive. Oculomotor physiologists have tackled these questions using an exemplar model for motor control, eye movements, and a multifaceted approach consisting of correlation of structure and function, effects of lesions, neuronal recordings, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Hypofunction of lobule X can lead to disinhibition of the superior vestibular nuclei neurons, resulting in spontaneous slow upward drift followed by corrective downward saccade (downbeat nystagmus). 28 Gaze-evoked nystagmus is another feature thought to be due to inadequate lobule X control on the brainstem ocular motor integrator. 28 These results correspond well with the frequently observed clinical feature of nystagmus, with 57% of our cohort having downbeat nystagmus, and 57% having gaze-evoked horizontal nystagmus – rates similar to other reported cohorts (range between 37 and 78%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 Hypofunction of lobule X can lead to disinhibition of the superior vestibular nuclei neurons, resulting in spontaneous slow upward drift followed by corrective downward saccade (downbeat nystagmus). 28 Gaze-evoked nystagmus is another feature thought to be due to inadequate lobule X control on the brainstem ocular motor integrator. 28 These results correspond well with the frequently observed clinical feature of nystagmus, with 57% of our cohort having downbeat nystagmus, and 57% having gaze-evoked horizontal nystagmus – rates similar to other reported cohorts (range between 37 and 78%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Gazeevoked nystagmus is another feature thought to be due to inadequate lobule X control on the brainstem ocular motor integrator. 24 These results correspond well with 57% of our cohort having downbeat nystagmus, and 57% having gaze-evoked horizontal nystagmus -rates similar to other reported cohorts (range between 37 and 78%). 3,15,25,26 Nystagmus was present in all the subjects included in the volumetric analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%