1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002210050768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar contribution to spatial event processing: characterization of procedural learning

Abstract: Recently, we demonstrated the prevalent role of cerebellar networks in the acquisition of the procedural components of spatial information by testing hemicerebellectomized (HCbed) rats in a classical spatial task, the Morris water maze (MWM). As procedures used in the water maze are a mixture of different components (that is, general procedures, exploration procedures, direct reaching procedures), for optimally solving a spatial task all procedural components must be opportunely managed. Thus, severely impaire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because our previous findings demonstrated the prevalent role of cerebellar circuits in acquisition rather than in storage or recall of procedural exploration strategies (3,13,16), we specifically tested acquisition by observation in an experimental group in which the cerebellar lesion preceded observation training (HϩO group). When tested in the MWM, these rats completely lacked the learning effects of observation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because our previous findings demonstrated the prevalent role of cerebellar circuits in acquisition rather than in storage or recall of procedural exploration strategies (3,13,16), we specifically tested acquisition by observation in an experimental group in which the cerebellar lesion preceded observation training (HϩO group). When tested in the MWM, these rats completely lacked the learning effects of observation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies have shown that visuomotor procedural learning is related to changes in the synaptic efficacy of motor cortex, the hypothesis of a contribution of other cortical and subcortical structures to the learning-associated modulation of cortical excitability has not yet been investigated. In the last decade, the role of the cerebellum in the acquisition of procedural competencies has been widely demonstrated in studies on rats, healthy human subjects, and cerebellar patients (Torriero et al, 2004Leggio et al, 1999;Gòmez-Beldarrain et al, 1998;Petrosini, Molinari, & DellʼAnna, 1996). A recent magnetoencephalography study demonstrated that after a perceptual-motor task had been learned a decrease in motor cortical activity was accompanied by an increase in cerebellar activity (Houweling, Daffertshofer, van Dijk, & Beek, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental findings show that the cerebellum is involved in learning new procedures during the actual execution of a task and during observational training (Ito, 2008;Petrosini, 2007;Torriero, Oliveri, Koch, Caltagirone, & Petrosini, 2004Leggio et al, 1999Leggio et al, , 2000 and, in particular, that it plays a key role in sequential procedural learning, as measured by a serial reaction time task (SRTT) (Gòmez-Beldarrain, Garcìa Moncò, Rubio, & Pascual-Leone, 1998;Molinari et al, 1997;Pascual-Leone, Grafman, Clark, Stewart, & Massaquoi, 1993). Furthermore, it has been shown that cerebellar rTMS decreases procedural learning during performance of an SRTT (Torriero et al, 2004) and interferes with acquisition of procedural competencies through observation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, experimental findings demonstrate that in rats cerebellar lesions markedly impair the learning of new procedures not only by actual execution of a task (Leggio et al, 1999) but also by observation (Leggio et al, 2000). Thus, there are a number of indications that cerebellar circuits are involved in ''motor thought'' whether they are accompanied by actual motor acts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%