2016
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceramic micro/ultra‐filtration of low‐concentration ultrafine sulfur in desulfurization wastewater

Abstract: BACKGROUND A low concentration of ultrafine suspended sulfur (SS) in the wastewater produced from the coking gas desulfurization process is a serious problem. In this study, ceramic microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes were used to remove ultrafine SS for further recovery. RESULTS Results showed that membrane with a pore size of 0.05 µm at the operating conditions 0.15 MPa, 40 °C and 4.0 m s−1 experienced the lowest flux decline and degree of fouling in comparison with other conditions. All membranes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, they have several drawbacks, including generating secondary pollutants, having high maintenance costs, and being ineffective in separating emulsion [21,22]. As compared to these methods, membrane technology is one of the most effective among these processes, as it can be broadly used for the handling of oily wastewater due to advantages such as its high separation performance, more straightforward process, low energy consumption, incredibly compact model and limited space requirements [22,23]. With these superior advantages, membrane filtration has emerged as a promising alternative for oily wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Overview On Oily Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, they have several drawbacks, including generating secondary pollutants, having high maintenance costs, and being ineffective in separating emulsion [21,22]. As compared to these methods, membrane technology is one of the most effective among these processes, as it can be broadly used for the handling of oily wastewater due to advantages such as its high separation performance, more straightforward process, low energy consumption, incredibly compact model and limited space requirements [22,23]. With these superior advantages, membrane filtration has emerged as a promising alternative for oily wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Overview On Oily Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with industrial wastewater with high salinity and high pollution, the FGD wastewater not only has high salt content [13], but also the more prominent problem is that suspended solids (SS) and turbidity in wastewater seriously exceed the standard [14]. High turbidity and high SS have seriously limited the selection of FGD wastewater ZLD process routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any research reported the membrane performances for marine scrubbers’ water treatment. Moreover, some studies deal with the usage of membrane technology, mainly with a succession of treatment steps from ultrafiltration (UF) to reverse osmosis (RO) for flue-gas desulfurization onshore [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. In case of ultrafiltration applied to this field, researchers report good, suspended solid removal and, according to Yin et al [ 35 ], UF membrane permeability stabilization is around 130 L h −1 m −2 bar −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%