2010
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2010.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceramic membrane ultrafiltration of natural surface water with ultrasound enhanced backwashing

Abstract: Ultrafiltration membrane cleaning with ultrasound enhanced backwashing was investigated with two ceramic membrane systems in parallel. One of them was subjected to ultrasound during backwashing, the other acted as a reference system. The feed water was directly taken from a creek with a sedimentation process as only pre-treatment. The cleaning performance was improved with ultrasound but after 3 weeks of operation damages occurred on the membranes. These effects were studied with online measurements of flux, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outline of such cleaning systems resembles the configuration in Fig. 3 [74], and positive effects on cleaning efficiency are reported for microfiltration [75], ultrafiltration [76,77], and reverse osmosis membranes [74]. Although crevices that are not easily reached by conventional methods can also be cleaned, it should be considered that, depending on input power, membrane damage may occur [78,79].…”
Section: Current Ultrasonic Cleaning Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outline of such cleaning systems resembles the configuration in Fig. 3 [74], and positive effects on cleaning efficiency are reported for microfiltration [75], ultrafiltration [76,77], and reverse osmosis membranes [74]. Although crevices that are not easily reached by conventional methods can also be cleaned, it should be considered that, depending on input power, membrane damage may occur [78,79].…”
Section: Current Ultrasonic Cleaning Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tight ceramic ultrafiltration membrane with molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) between 1 and 3 kDa can potentially be used as a novel method for RO pre-treatment. On one hand, more robust backwashing and harsh chemical cleaning can be applied to the tight ceramic UF membrane to control membrane fouling (Boley et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2008). On the other hand, rejection of charged solutes, such as phosphate, by a charged tight ceramic membrane can hypothetically be achieved due to electrostatic exclusion from a charged membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason for this optimum filtration process is the US's low frequency, which could increase the removal of the fouling layer from the membrane surface. The low US frequency results in 1) localized turbulence and stronger vibration [101,122] and 2) lower concentration polarization and the cake layer resistance [90,102,105,123]. , [124], its effect also depends on the feed solution matrix.…”
Section: Uf-usmentioning
confidence: 99%