Bioceramics 1997
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008042692-1/50064-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceramic—Ceramic bearing systems compared on different testing configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Ce-TZP/ Al 2 O 3 showed lower wear rate despite relatively higher friction coefficient than alumina, such a contradictory result is not uncommon in ceramic-on-ceramic wear tests. 34,35 However, the wear test conducted in this study was small scale and not physiological. The pin-on-disk test was conducted because it is considered convenient and suitable for first evaluation of new ceramics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although Ce-TZP/ Al 2 O 3 showed lower wear rate despite relatively higher friction coefficient than alumina, such a contradictory result is not uncommon in ceramic-on-ceramic wear tests. 34,35 However, the wear test conducted in this study was small scale and not physiological. The pin-on-disk test was conducted because it is considered convenient and suitable for first evaluation of new ceramics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%