2012
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cepheids and other short-period variables near the Galactic Centre

Abstract: We report the result of our near-infrared survey of short-period variable stars (P < 60 d) in a field-of-view of 20 ′ × 30 ′ towards the Galactic Centre. Forty-five variables are discovered and we classify the variables based on their light curve shapes and other evidence. In addition to 3 classical Cepheids reported previously, we find 16 type II Cepheids, 24 eclipsing binaries, one pulsating star with P = 0.265 d (RR Lyr or δ Sct) and one Cepheid-like variable whose nature is uncertain. Eclipsing binaries ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groenewegen, Udalski & Bono (2008) used NIR data for 39 population II Cepheids in the bulge from the ogle survey; a related work is by Majaess (2010). Matsunaga et al (2011Matsunaga et al ( , 2013 analysed 3 classical Cepheids and 16 type Recent determinations of the distance to the Galactic Center, R0, used for weighted averages and in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Secondary Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groenewegen, Udalski & Bono (2008) used NIR data for 39 population II Cepheids in the bulge from the ogle survey; a related work is by Majaess (2010). Matsunaga et al (2011Matsunaga et al ( , 2013 analysed 3 classical Cepheids and 16 type Recent determinations of the distance to the Galactic Center, R0, used for weighted averages and in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Secondary Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual distance moduli are listed in Col. 9 of Tables 3 and 4 with their uncertainties. The Galactocentric distances listed in Col. 10 of Tables 3 and 4 were estimated assuming a solar Galactocentric distance of 7.94 ± 0.37 ± 0.26 kpc (Groenewegen et al 2008;Matsunaga et al 2013, and references therein). The final error on R G accounts for errors affecting both the solar Galactocentric and heliocentric distances.…”
Section: Distance Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations at about 30 epochs were made between 2007 and 2012. The basic data analysis was done in the same manner as in Matsunaga et al (2009Matsunaga et al ( , 2013. In short, point-spreadfunction (PSF) fitting photometry was performed on every image using the IRAF/DAOPHOT package, and variable stars were searched for by considering the standard deviations of time-series photometric data.…”
Section: Observation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability search was done using the three-band datasets independently, so that we could find variables even if they are visible only in one of the JHKs bands. In addition, we included the variable stars in Matsunaga et al (2013) which are within the fields of this survey even if their variations are slightly smaller than the detection limits of variability. This survey is slightly shallower than that of Matsunaga et al (2013), and as a result many objects are too faint to be detected in J band.…”
Section: Observation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%