2020
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cephalopelvic disproportion as primary diagnosis for cesarean section: Role of neonatal birthweight in relation to maternal height at a Hospital in Merida, Mexico

Abstract: Objective To analyze the association between newborn and maternal characteristics and the risk for cesarean section (CS) due to cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) and non‐CPD causes compared to vaginal deliveries (VD) in a sample of infants and mothers from Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Methods The final sample consisted of 3453 single, live, and term infants born between January 2016 and May 2017 at the Maternal‐Infant Hospital in Merida and their mothers (aged ≥19 years). The mode of delivery was established as th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, this nutritional burden can exacerbate the tight fetopelvic fit and has been proposed to explain elevated levels of obstructed labour, Caesarean sections, and infant mortality on the populational level (Wells, 2017 ; Wells et al ., 2018 ), but also in specific subgroups of various modern human populations, e.g. in Southeast Asian immigrants in the United States (Abitbol et al ., 1997 ) and in under‐resourced communities in Mexico (Mendez‐Dominguez et al ., 2021 ).…”
Section: Alternative and Complementary Views To The Obstetrical Dilemma Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this nutritional burden can exacerbate the tight fetopelvic fit and has been proposed to explain elevated levels of obstructed labour, Caesarean sections, and infant mortality on the populational level (Wells, 2017 ; Wells et al ., 2018 ), but also in specific subgroups of various modern human populations, e.g. in Southeast Asian immigrants in the United States (Abitbol et al ., 1997 ) and in under‐resourced communities in Mexico (Mendez‐Dominguez et al ., 2021 ).…”
Section: Alternative and Complementary Views To The Obstetrical Dilemma Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavier, large neonates have shown an increased risk for DDH (Lapunzina et al, 2002), this may be due to a mechanical process occurred at the end of pregnancy. Previous studies also reported propensity among women from Yucatan to deliver via cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion, particularly when the ratio between birth weight and maternal height increased (Mendez‐Dominguez et al, 2021). This may explain, at least partially, the increased odds for cesarean section among women whose neonates had hip dysplasia, as their fetuses were also significantly heavier than non‐dysplasia neonates, even in absence of macrosomia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Yucatan, located in southeast Mexico, concentrates mestizo population from Mayan ancestry, who preserve not only their phenotypic characteristics but also their cultural heritage and unfortunately, certain social inequities that limit the access to healthcare may influence the development of certain conditions (Azcorra & Mendez, 2018; Mendez‐Dominguez et al, 2021). But to our knowledge, the incidence of DDH in southeast Mexico among newborns has not yet been described, nor have their correlates explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, others show moderate to high heterogeneity across studies and suggest issues of publication bias and residual confounding (Kuhle et al, 2015; Sutharsan et al, 2015). Confounders range from maternal/gestational characteristics that increase the risk of having a cesarean delivery (e.g., maternal advanced age, parity, previous cesareans, short stature, obesity, preexisting comorbidities, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, fetal macrosomia and post‐maturity) (Campillo‐Artero et al, 2018; de Souza et al, 2019; Edelblute & Altman, 2021; Hure et al, 2017; Mendez‐Dominguez et al, 2021; Wells et al, 2018); type of cesarean delivery (e.g., pre/post labor, elective, planned for medical reasons, and emergency) (Cai et al, 2018; Chojnacki et al, 2019; Sitarik et al, 2020); and postnatal biological and behavioral factors that are associated with cesarean delivery (e.g., formula feeding, administration of antibiotics, altered cortisol profiles and gene expression) (Forbes et al, 2018; Kothiyal et al, 2020; Martinez et al, 2020; Rosenberg & Trevathan, 2018; Stinson et al, 2018; Tully & Ball, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%