2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: A preliminary report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of AMSD is recommended as an alternative method to conventional Le Fort I osteotomy and rigid external distraction systems for CLP patients with severe velopharyngeal incompetence as it does not affect the velopharyngeal sphincter. 7 Patients who have a class I molar relationship, negative or zero overjet, or impacted or malaligned anterior teeth are ideal candidates. 5,17,18 In these patients, the treatment objective should be to create space for the eruption of impacted anterior teeth or for their alignment by increasing the arch length while maintaining the class I molar relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of AMSD is recommended as an alternative method to conventional Le Fort I osteotomy and rigid external distraction systems for CLP patients with severe velopharyngeal incompetence as it does not affect the velopharyngeal sphincter. 7 Patients who have a class I molar relationship, negative or zero overjet, or impacted or malaligned anterior teeth are ideal candidates. 5,17,18 In these patients, the treatment objective should be to create space for the eruption of impacted anterior teeth or for their alignment by increasing the arch length while maintaining the class I molar relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancement using DO is an effective alternative treatment [4][5][6][7]12 , because it is accompanied by soft tissue genesis 8 . DO has advanced craniofacial surgery and has become an established method for the management of craniofacial deformities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first applications in the craniofacial region were performed in the mandible following the report of Snyder (2) who lengthened the lower jaw of a dog. Later on, this approach has been used in the treatment of patients with maxillary hypoplasia (3)(4)(5)(6). In the last decade, distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton has become increasingly popular as an alternative to many conventional orthognathic surgical procedures and to date, the mandible, maxilla, entire midface and orbits, as well as cranial bones have been successfully distracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton has become increasingly popular as an alternative to many conventional orthognathic surgical procedures and to date, the mandible, maxilla, entire midface and orbits, as well as cranial bones have been successfully distracted. Premaxillary distraction osteogenesis is a new method used to correct mild midface deficiency while gaining space by increasing the arch parameter (5)(6)(7). Asymmetric application of the premaxillary distraction osteogenesis may be an effective method to correct midline shift and anterior cross bite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%